不同稻作系统的单位经济收益碳足迹 (kg CO2-eq yuan-1)
近日，华中农业大学宏观农业研究院、植物科学技术学院农业生态研究团队与中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所合作研究，回答了不同水稻生产系统如何实现固碳减排的问题。
该研究基于农业生态团队在湖北省不同试验站采用统一的静态箱-气相色谱法测定的水稻-冬闲模式、水稻-油菜轮作模式、水稻-小麦模式、双季稻（早稻+晚稻）和水稻-小龙虾共作模式等水稻生产系统的CH4和N2O排放试验数据，结合生物地球化学循环DNDC（DeNitrification DeComposition）模型，将观测结果使用模型统一到相同环境背景进行比较模拟，并分别采用基于过程的生命周期评估(PLCA)方法和成本效益分析方法对生产系统的碳足迹和经济效益计算，系统评估不同水稻生产系统不同减排措施下的经济产出和碳足迹。
研究结果表明，每种水稻生产系统需要配置不同的减排措施，才能够实现高收入-低排放，并且相同的措施在不同模式中的减排角色可能不同。该研究可为不同水稻生产系统增效低碳生产提供技术指导。
研究成果以“Comparing rice production systems in China:Economic output and carbon footprint”为题发表在Science of the Total Environment上，宏观农业研究院凌霖博士后为第一作者，曹凑贵教授为通讯作者。上述研究获得国家重点研发计划项目和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金等项目的共同资助。
审核人：江洋
【英文摘要】
In recent years, many rotational and integrated rice production systems coupled with several greenhouse gas(GHG) emissions mitigation practices have been developed and adopted for demand of low carbon production.However, there have been only few studies about comparisons on the balance between high production and mitigationof GHG emissions in different rice production systems. We therefore aimed to evaluate economic outputand carbon footprint of different rice production systems, based on several long-term experiments conducted byour lab. CH4 andN2O emission were measured by the same static chamber/gas chromatogram measurement procedurein different rice production systems, including rice-fallow, rice-rapeseed, rice-wheat, double rice, and integratedrice-crayfish production system. Then, we applied the DeNitrification DeComposition model to simulateCH4 and N2O emission over different years under the same condition for comparison. Carbon footprint was calculatedfollowing the process-based life cycle assessment (PLCA) methodology. The economic benefit of rice productionsystems was assessed by cost-benefit analysis. According to the analysis, the double-rice productionsystem exhibited the highest intensity of carbon footprint (ICF = 4.14 kg CO2-eq yuan−1), rain-fed treatmentin the rice-rapeseed system had the lowest (ICF = 0.68 kg CO2-eq yuan−1). The intensity of carbon footprintin different treatments in the integrated rice-crayfish production system was around 0.8 kg CO2-eq yuan−1. Overall,the results of this case study suggest: (1) the proposed practices in different rice production systems are nostraw returning (rice-fallow), no-tillage without straw returning (rice-wheat), rain-fed farming (rice-rapeseed),no insect and no inoculation (double rice), and feeding with straw returning (rice-crayfish); (2) rotational andintegrated systems can achieve high net output with low carbon emission; (3) reducing the amount of nitrogenousfertilizer application is the most important and effective GHG mitigation practice for rotational systems.
论文链接：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147890
本文版权归原作者所有，文章内容不代表平台观点或立场。如有关于文章内容、版权或其他问题请与我方联系，我方将在核实情况后对相关内容做删除或保留处理！